Quantum security discussions often focus on cryptography itself, but I think the harder challenge is migration.
Imagine a blockchain that upgrades to post-quantum signatures while wallets, bridges, and dApps all adopt them at different speeds. Even if the cryptography is ready, fragmented adoption could become the real security risk.
I’m curious how @quipnetwork thinks about this transition. Should ecosystems prioritize backward compatibility to reduce friction, or push for faster adoption even if it temporarily increases complexity?
The technology matters, but so does the migration strategy. That’s where long-term resilience will be decided.